Operations template
A board for writing a small software team's routines and getting them adopted: agree what done and ready-for-release mean, draft how changes are requested, reviewed, tested, released and recovered, then pilot the set before briefing everyone.
No account and no email needed. Opens in Excel or Google Sheets.
Fourteen tasks across six stages, each with a completion criterion and its own checklist, plus a suggested day. The pilot is time-boxed and comes before the rollout, because a routine the team has never run is a document rather than a practice.
Small teams run on shared assumptions that stop being shared as soon as the team grows. Everyone has a different idea of what done means, code review depends on who picks it up, and the release process is whatever the person who built the pipeline remembers about it.
What that looks like
An engineering lead or manager of a small software team who wants written routines for how changes are requested, reviewed, tested, released and recovered.
Group is the stage of the SOP set: scope and owners, change flow, quality gates, release and recovery, approval and pilot, rollout and review. Status and priority already use the product's own fixed values, so they map without edits.
Download the CSV
It opens in Excel or Google Sheets. Edit the tasks first if you like, or import it as it is.
Create a board in TaskSiddhi
Give it a name, such as the week, the project or the client.
Open the spreadsheet import
Upload the CSV. Columns are matched automatically; map Group, Done when and Checklist to a text column or to custom fields.
Preview, then import
Check the rows before anything is written, then import.
Make it yours
Work stages one to four as drafting, then use stage five as a real time-boxed pilot. Only brief the whole team once the pilot has been reviewed.
All fourteen tasks, with their completion criteria and checklists. Owner and due date are left blank on purpose.
14 tasks in 6 groups, 56 checklist items
List the routines that matter most or cause the most rework, choose the first few to draft, and for each name an owner role and where the authoritative document will live.
Done when
A ranked shortlist with a reason and an owner role is recorded, and each selected routine has a planned document location; its identifier is added when the draft exists.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Separate three states: code complete, approved for release and released. Agree what must be true at each, and record who can approve a documented exception.
Done when
Entry criteria for release and separate completion criteria for the change are defined, and the role that can approve a documented exception is recorded.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Set who accepts requests, what information a request needs, who sets priority and by what team-defined scale, and a separate route for urgent production issues.
Done when
The draft names who accepts requests, the required request information, who sets priority on which team-defined scale, and the urgent route, with a recorded document identifier.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Describe how branches are named and merged, who must review a change, what reviewers check and the expected turnaround. Define which changes qualify for an exception, who authorises it before release, where the reason and the compensating review or test are recorded, and when that follow-up is due.
Done when
The draft states branching and merge rules, who must review, what reviewers check and the turnaround, and defines which changes may skip review, who authorises it, where the reason is recorded and when follow-up is due.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
State which checks must pass for each type of change, automated or manual. Define which changes qualify for an exception, who authorises it before release, where the reason and the compensating review or test are recorded, and when that follow-up is due.
Done when
The draft lists required checks per change type and defines which changes qualify for an override, who authorises it, where the reason and compensating test are recorded and when follow-up is due.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Name the accountable security role. If the team has none, assign one first. Flag changes such as authentication, secrets, customer-data handling, dependencies or production access as routing triggers, not controls.
Done when
An accountable security role is named (assigned first if missing), the routing triggers are listed, and the draft states that the controls themselves are defined and approved by that role, not by this board.
Checklist0 of 3 ticked
Set out what is prepared before a release, who approves it, which roles may perform it, and how users and the team are told.
Done when
The draft names the preparation steps, the approver, the roles that may release and the announcement route, with a recorded document identifier.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
State when a release is rolled back or recovered forward, which roles decide and execute it, how the method is tested and where results are recorded; some changes cannot be rolled back.
Done when
The draft identifies rollback or forward-recovery triggers, decision and execution roles, a test method and a record location; before general rollout an exercised recovery result, or an explicit limitation with an owner-approved alternative, is recorded.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
List which roles may access production and how access is requested, approved and removed. Credentials and keys stay in the team's secret store; references on the board must not embed sensitive content.
Done when
The draft lists roles, the grant and removal process and where access records live, states that credentials and keys are kept only in the team's secret store, and that references on the board embed no sensitive content.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Say who is alerted, how severity is set on the team's own scale, who leads the response, and where the follow-up is recorded; incident details stay in the team's incident system, not on this board.
Done when
The draft names who is alerted, the severity scale, the response lead role and the follow-up record location, and states that incident details stay in the team's incident system.
Checklist0 of 5 ticked
Send the drafts to the engineering lead and the accountable security role, record each person's approval or required changes, and approve a version for a time-boxed pilot only; nothing is generally effective yet.
Done when
The engineering lead and the accountable security role have each recorded approval, or required changes are completed and the revision approved, for a named pilot version with a start and end date.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Brief only the named pilot participants on the pilot version, record failures, and send any material revision back for approval; do not brief the wider team until the pilot decision is made.
Done when
Named pilot participants were briefed on the pilot version, failures are recorded, each material revision was reapproved, and a dated pilot decision (adopt, revise or drop each routine) is recorded with no customer data in comments or attachments.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Record each adopted routine's identifier, version, approval date and effective date, brief the remaining team including new joiners, and check coverage against an access-controlled roster reference.
Done when
Each adopted routine has an identifier, version, approval date and an effective date after the pilot decision, and briefing coverage is recorded as the version, briefing date and outstanding count against an access-controlled roster reference.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Review after the first release under the routines and again at a scheduled date, for example 30 days after rollout; review any incident separately if one occurs. Record findings, owners and dates, or why no change is needed.
Done when
A review is recorded after the first release and at the scheduled date, each justified change has an owner and due date or a no-change reason is recorded, and any incident follow-up is recorded separately if one occurred.
Checklist0 of 4 ticked
Open a task to see what counts as finished and its checklist. Ticks here are just to try it out and are not saved.
The same rows as a CSV. Columns in the file: Task, Group, Status, Priority, Owner, Due date, Suggested day, Done when, Checklist, Notes.
Download software development sop (CSV)The measured demand behind this template, and what it does not prove. We publish it so the page cannot be mistaken for a forecast.
| Keyword | India | US | UK | UAE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| software development sop(target) | 70 | 50 | 10 | 10 |
An engineering lead formalising how a small team works. The measured volume is small and the phrasing is unusual for this audience, so the page is published for the people who search it rather than as a traffic bet.
What we hold this page to
Thin or mismatched demand — no traffic expectation
Not checked for this template.
No. It is a board for writing down the routines your team already half-follows, and getting them approved, piloted and adopted. It takes no position on whether you work in sprints, in flow, or in something you made up.
Because the release, access and incident routines have security consequences that an engineering lead is not always the right person to accept alone. Who that role is depends on your organisation; the board just requires it to be named.
A fixed period long enough to include at least one real release and ideally one incident or rollback. A pilot that only covers the easy path tells you nothing about the routines that matter most.
The routine for handling them, yes. Individual incidents are better as their own dated tasks or in whatever tracker you use, so each has its own record and follow-up actions.
See reportingThe gates are, probably. The definitions of done and ready-for-release, and a written rollback, are not: those are exactly what a team of three loses first when one person is unavailable.
Import the template, assign owners and see what is overdue at a glance. Free, with no paid plan.
Not sure it fits? See who TaskSiddhi is for
